Every number on this page has a source.
No rounded-up percentages. Real clients with real analytics behind them, described by industry rather than by name, a change log you can interrogate, our own audit scores labelled as our own, and four Clutch awards you can verify yourself. Every figure comes from their Google Analytics, Search Console, or our change log.
What happened when a law firm stuck with it for three years?
An Australian firm working in commercial litigation and family law. Three years of steady work, then a deliberate repositioning in 2026. Here is what their analytics show.
Brain Buddy AI makes Australian businesses visible in search and AI search. Our agent proposes fixes, a person approves every one, copy changes come to you first, the changes ship to the live site, and we check the page after. These are the results, sourced.
800
Enquiries in 12 months from people who found the firm on Google, not through an ad
The firm's own form log, Sep 2025 to Aug 2026: answered "Google", no ad-click tag
288
Enquiries captured by the firm's website assistant, each with a name, email and phone
Brain Buddy Studio, 1 May to 30 Sep 2026: one per person, tests removed
578%
Growth in organic search sessions
GA4 quarterly totals: 4,056 (Q1 2023) to 27,510 (Q1 2026)
5x
More clicks from Google search
Search Console: 1,346 (Mar 2025) to 6,898 (Mar 2026) a month
One client, three years, every figure from the firm’s own form log, its website assistant, GA4 and Search Console. Every business starts from a different position, so no two results look the same.
When patients ask AI who to trust, who does it name?
A specialist neurosurgery practice in the United States. In under three months it became the practice ChatGPT names first when people in its city ask who to trust with a brain aneurysm or a second opinion. On 28 June 2026 our monitoring also caught ChatGPT linking to the practice’s website as a source in its answer.
The same work that lifts a site in Google makes it readable to AI. We build the answer blocks, structured data and AI-crawler access that let ChatGPT and Google’s AI Overviews read a business and quote it.
6 / 6
ChatGPT answers that name the practice
Six high-intent 'best brain surgeon in [their city]' questions, June 2026
#3
On Google for 'neurosurgeon near me'
Page one for the local searches that bring patients, June 2026
16x
More Google search impressions
Search Console: 152 the month before launch to 2,506 in July 2026
~90
Days from launch to AI answers
Campaign began 30 March 2026; ChatGPT naming the practice by late June
Published with the practice’s permission, name withheld. The Google figures are from their own Search Console; the AI answers were observed and screenshotted in June 2026.
When locals ask AI who to call for pests, who does it name?
A pest control business in Australia. In its first three months it became one of the names Google’s AI and ChatGPT put forward when locals ask who to call, named first for cockroaches ahead of the national brands. Between 28 June and 3 September 2026, ChatGPT linked its website as a source for 46 of the 69 pest control questions our monitoring tracks for the business.
The same answer-engine work that names a specialist clinic names a local trade. We build the answer blocks, structured data and AI-crawler access that let Google’s AI and ChatGPT read a business and quote it.
1st
Listed first for cockroach help in its city, ahead of two national brands
Google AI Overview, observed June 2026
46
Pest control questions where ChatGPT linked their site as a source
Of 69 tracked questions, 28 June to 3 September 2026
530
SEO changes shipped in three months
On-page and structured data that make the site quotable
1 in 4
Conversations became a lead via the site assistant
Name, email and phone, 15 enquiries captured automatically
Published with the business’s permission, name withheld. The Google figures are from their own Search Console; the AI answers were observed and screenshotted in June 2026.
What is actually driving these results?
Studio, the dashboard we built to run every campaign. It holds your citations engine by engine, your Google data, your named competitors, your site health scores and the full change log in one place, and clients log into the same system we work in. Because the evidence and the work live together, deciding what to fix next takes days, not reporting cycles.
Watch
The Monitoring Agent runs your tracked buyer queries against ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, while GA4 and Search Console feed in what real visitors and rankings are doing.
Rank
Every finding lands on one task list, ranked by what will make the biggest difference to your visibility. The data picks the next job.
Approve
A person approves every proposed change before it ships: our team for technical fixes, you for anything that changes your page copy. Nothing touches your site without a name signed to it.
Ship
Approved changes go live through our WordPress plugin or Next.js companion. Usually within the week, instantly when it matters.
Verify
We fetch the live page and confirm the change is really there. Not a screenshot in a deck. The actual page.
Learn
The next probe shows what moved. What worked ships more, and a lost citation is flagged for recovery before your next report. Then it starts again at 01.
Decisions in days, not reporting cycles.
The loop runs continuously. When the data says move, a fix is proposed, approved by a person and shipped, and you watch it land in Studio instead of waiting for a monthly PDF.
Every change starts from evidence.
The probes, the analytics and the change log live in one system, so the next decision starts from what the last change did. Guesswork never makes the task list.
Receipts, not promises.
Every change carries a time stamp, a name and a live-page check, logged from proposal to verification. If you ever wonder what you are paying for, the answer is one login away.
6,993 changes shipped through this loop since March 2026 · 4,490 re-checked live on the page · counted live from the change log
How often does AI name our clients?
Live from our citation probe: real buyer questions where an AI engine that searches the web names the client in its answer or cites the client’s own site. Counted by industry, because the question itself would tell you who the client is.
1,014
Tracked questions where AI names or cites a client
9
Clients cited, across 5 industries
Last 120 days, to 7 Nov 2026 · counted live from the probe · only engines that search the web count, never a model answering from memory
Do AI engines actually start citing you?
Slowly, and from zero. That is the honest answer. Most businesses have no AI citations at all when we first probe the engines, and nobody can promise a third-party system will mention you. What we can show is real early movement.
We do not promise citations. We promise the work that earns them, and the evidence trail that proves the work shipped.
For questions about which franchise in its category to buy in Australia, Google's AI Overview names one of our clients, an Australian franchise brand, first and cites its own pages. Perplexity cites the brand's site for the franchise questions we track.
What do clients say where we cannot edit it?
Clutch interviews clients directly and verifies every review. In 2026 that earned us four awards across Sydney and Australia. The reviews behind them are public, in our clients’ own words.
4
Verified Clutch awards across Sydney and Australia in 2026, backed by real client reviews on Clutch.
The next set of numberscould be yours.
Start with the free audit. It shows where AI engines can see you, where they cannot, and what we would fix first. If we work together, every change lands in a change log like the one above.